NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Fernance Family Holdings v Newcastle City Council [2003] NSWLEC 114 APPLICANT: Fernance Family Holdings PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Newcastle City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10273 of 2003 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- in class 1 proceedings-Costs Motion seeking to modify an expired development consent. Motion bound to fail. Costs awarded. LEGISLATION CITED: CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 21/03/2003 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 03/21/2003
APPLICANT: Mr D Wilson, Barrister SOLICITORS Turnbull Hill LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr S Brockwell, Barrister SOLICITORS Sparkes Helmore
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Matter No . . 10273 of 2003 Coram : Bignold J 21 March 2003
FERNANCE FAMILY HOLDINGS PTY LIMITED
Applicant
v
NEWCASTLE CITY COUNCIL
Respondent
JUDGMENT
1. The Court has before it two Notices of Motion brought in Class 1 proceedings which were filed in Court on 13 March 2003, being an appeal against the Council's deemed refusal of a development application to use the hotel's car parking area for functions on Anzac Day and Melbourne Cup Day, the hotel being the Cricketer's Arms Hotel situated the corner of Bruce and Bull Streets, Cooks Hill. One Motion seeks an order for expedition and the other Motion seeks an immediate modification of a now expired development consent.
2. The development application was lodged with the Council in January of this year and it was supported by a detailed statement of environmental effects.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate