NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Thiessen Architects v Council of the City of Sydney [2004] NSWLEC 395 APPLICANT Thiessen Architects PARTIES : RESPONDENT Council of the City of Sydney FILE NUMBER(S) : 10404 of 2004 CORAM: Moore C Development Consent :- KEY ISSUES: Modification application . Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 96AA LEGISLATION CITED: Central Sydney Development Control Plan 1996 . Moy v Warringah Shire Council 2004 NSWCCA 77; CASES CITED: Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 373; Parsonage v Ku-ring-gai 2004 NSWLEC 337 ; . DATES OF HEARING: 15 July 2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/23/2004
APPLICANT Mr J Strati, solicitor Avendra Singh Strati & Kam
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr D Parry, barrister INSTRUCTED BY Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
MOORE C
23 July 2004
04/10404 Thiessen Architects v City of Sydney
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal pursuant to s 96AA of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 seeking a variation to a consent granted by the Court for the construction of a of a new building at 262 Castlereagh Street, Sydney. The modification application had been refused by the Council of the City of Sydney (the council).
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate