NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : D'Arcy v Bega Valley Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 88 APPLICANT John Kevin D'Arcy PARTIES : RESPONDENT Bega Valley Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10945 of 2001 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- Preliminary determination of questions whether proposed subdivision creating concessional lots is permissible development LEGISLATION CITED: Bega Valley Local Environment Plan 1987 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 4 April 2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/26/2002
APPLICANT Mr J D'Arcy (in person)
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr M McMahon (solicitor) SOLICITORS M.E. McMahon & Associates
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND Matter No: 10945 of 2001 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Pain J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 26 June 2002
JOHN KEVIN D'ARCY Applicant v BEGA VALLEY SHIRE COUNCIL Respondent
JUDGMENT
Introduction 1. The Applicant representing himself has commenced a Class 1 appeal against a refusal by Bega Valley Shire Council (the Council) of a subdivision application DA 01/1022 made by the Applicant in relation to Portions 50, 51 and 52 in DP 750190 Parish of Bega, known as Lot C (Lot C). The Council by Notice of Motion has raised a number of preliminary points of law concerning the interpretation of clauses in the Bega Valley Local Environmental Plan 1987 (the LEP) relating to the operation of concessional allotment provisions in relation to "existing holdings" as defined under the LEP. This judgment considers these preliminary issues of law only. Depending on the outcome of the questions of law the matter may need to be considered on its merits in a subsequent hearing.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate