NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hornsby Shire Council v Surace [2004] NSWLEC 216 PARTIES : Hornsby Shire Council (Prosecutor) Ricky Surace (Defendant) FILE NUMBER(S) : 50092 of 2003 CORAM: McClellan CJ Environmental Offences :- Demolition and damage to a heritage-listed garden No development consent KEY ISSUES: Extent of the heritage listing Description in local environmental plan of the heritage item Proudman v Dayman defence of honest and reasonable mistake Questions of law and questions of fact LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW) Griffin & Elliott v Marsh (1994) 34 NSWLR 104; Howell v Falmouth Boat Construction Co Ltd [1951] AC 837; Iannella v French (1968) 119 CLR 84; Palmer v Ostrowski (2002) 26 WAR 289; CASES CITED: Power v Huffa (1976) 14 SASR 337; Proudman v Dayman (1941) 67 CLR 536; Strathfield v Elvy (1992) 25 NSWLR 745; Thomas v The King (1937) 59 CLR 279; Von Lieven v Stewart (1990) 21 NSWLR 52 DATES OF HEARING: 10-11 March 2004 EX TEMPORE 03/11/2004 JUDGMENT DATE :
P W Larkin (Prosecutor) Michell Sillar (Solicitors - Prosecutor)
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
I Lloyd QC (Defendant) Minter Ellison (Solicitors - Defendant)
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 50092/03
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate