NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Sam and Vera Touma v Holroyd City Council [2004] NSWLEC 225 APPLICANT Sam and Vera Touma PARTIES : RESPONDENT Holroyd City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10238 of 2004 CORAM: Watts C KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Streetscape and appearance of bulk and Overlooking Holroyd Local Environmental Plan 1991,(HLEP) Development Control Plan No 1 - "Guidelines for dual occupancy development" (DCP1) LEGISLATION CITED: Development Control Plan No 4(B) - "Guidelines for dual occupancy development" (DCP4(B)) Development Control Plan No 6 - "Guidelines for Subdivision" (DCP6) Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, ss 79C and 97 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 10/05/2004. On site hearing at 9.30am and resumed at the Council's conference room 1. EX TEMPORE 05/10/2004 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT Mr J Maston, barrister instructed by Mr Tohme, solicitor
SOLICITOR Greenaway & Tohme LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr J Reilly, solicitor
SOLICTOR Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT: Appeal No: 10238 of 2004 IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
10238 of 2004 Watts C 10 May 2004 Sam and Vera Touma Applicant
v Holroyd Council Respondent Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate