NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Figtree Hill v Cleary Bros and others (No 2) [2006] NSWLEC 63
APPLICANT Figtree Hill Pty Limited
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Cleary Bros (Bombo) Pty Limited
SECOND RESPONDENT Minister for Infrastructure and Planning
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10639 of 2005
CORAM: Hussey C - Brown C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- the extension to an existing hard rock quarry - written submissions on conditions
DATES OF HEARING: Written submissions 27/01/06
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/21/2006
APPLICANT Ms J Reid, solicitor SOLICITORS Pike, Pike and Fenwick
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: FIRST RESPONDENT Ms A Penklis, solicitor SOLICITORS Sparke Helmore
SECOND RESPONDENT No submissions
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C with Brown C
21 February 2006
10639 of 2005 Figtree Hill Pty Limited (Applicant) v Cleary Bros (Bombo) Pty Limited (First Respondent) and
Minister for Infrastructure and Planning (Second Respondent)
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONERS: The appeal is made pursuant to s 98 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the EPA Act) where an objector who is dissatisfied with the determination of a consent authority to a development application for designated development may appeal to the Court.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate