NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Williams v Director General National Parks and Wildlife Service and Ors. [2002] NSWLEC 231 APPLICANT: Williams
FIRST RESPONDENT: The Director General National Parks and Wildlife Service
SECOND RESPONDENT: Barrick Australia Limited Acn 007 857 598 PARTIES : THIRD RESPONDENT: Barrick Gold of Australia ACN 008 143 137
FOURTH RESPONDENT: Dr Colin Pardoe
FIFTH RESPONDENT: Dr J Kamminga FILE NUMBER(S) : 40964 of 2002 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Injunctions and Declarations - Interlocutory Relief :- Challenge to validity of Permit and Consent issues pursuant to National Parks and Wildlife Act in respect of Aboriginal object situate on site of proposed Gold Mine. LEGISLATION CITED: National Parks and wildlife Act 1974 s 87 and s 90 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 29/11/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/03/2002
APPLICANT: Mr A Oshlack, Agent
SOLICITORS N/A
1st RESPONDENT: Ms A Pearman, Barrister 2nd & 3rd RESPONDENTS: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr N Williams SC 4th & 5th RESPONDENTS: Mr M Brennan
SOLICITORS: 1st RESPONDENT: National Parks and Wildlife Service 2nd - 5th RESPONDENTS: Blake Dawson Waldron
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate