NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 139 LGERA 84
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Huntington & Macgillivray v Hurstville City Council & Ors [No 2] [2005] NSWLEC 155
APPLICANT: Huntington & Macgillivray FIRST RESPONDENT: PARTIES : Hurstville City Council SECOND RESPONDENTS: David and Rosaline Kutcher
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10873 of 2004
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- operation of s40 of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 if development consent required for land not part of development application - whether can have deferred commencement conditions if no legal access for development
Conveyancing Act 1919 s 88K Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 79C, s 97 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 1994 cl 46 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulations 2000 cl 49 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 40
Becton Corporation Pty Limited v Minister for Infrastructure, Planning and Natural Resources & Anor [2005] NSWLEC 197; Billgate Pty Limited v Woollahra Municipal Council [2004] NSWLEC 436; Hillpalm Pty Ltd v Tweed Shire Council & Anor (2002) 119 LGERA 86; CASES CITED: Huntington & Macgillivray v Hurstville City Council & Ors [2004] NSWLEC 694; King v Great Lakes Shire Council (1986) 58 LGRA 366; North Sydney Council v Ligon 302 Pty Limited (1996) 185 CLR 470; Weal v Bathurst City Council & Anor (2000) 111 LGERA 181
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate