Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION : Raiti v Leichhardt Council (2) [2005] NSWLEC 410
APPLICANT
Raiti
PARTIES :
RESPONDENT
Leichhardt Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11302 of 2004
CORAM: Tuor C.
Development Application :- Alterations and additions to an existing single storey house
KEY ISSUES: Amended plans address issues of streetscape setback bulk and scale privacy and overshadowing.
LEGISLATION CITED: Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan 2000
DATES OF HEARING: 21/07/2005
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 07/21/2005
APPLICANT
Mr Howard, barrister
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT
Ms Rankin, solicitor
Pike Pike & Fenwick
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Tuor C
21 July 2005
11302 of 2004 Raiti v Leichhardt Municipal Council (2)
JUDGMENT
1 On 28 April 2005, I delivered a preliminary judgment on this appeal. The appeal is against the refusal by Leichhardt Municipal Council of a development application for alterations and additions to an existing single storey house at 59 Louisa Road, Birchgrove, to provide a two storey dwelling and off street parking for two cars.
2 The judgment addressed a number of issues with the proposal including its streetscape impact as a result of the front setback and two car parking spaces, rear setback and resultant impact on bulk and scale, privacy and overshadowing of adjoining properties. I found that in its current form the application does not warrant approval but that amended plans could address the issues of concern. The parties agreed to this course of action and the applicant prepared amended plans. Council renotified the amended plans and no submissions received. The parties then sought consent orders from the court.
3 The amended plans delete one car parking space, reduce the front setback, increase the rear setback of the upper level and change the rear roof form. I am satisfied that the amended plans address the issues raised in the preliminary judgment and that the proposal is acceptable.
Orders
The Orders of the Court, by consent, are:
1 The appeal be upheld.
2 Development consent be granted to development application D/2004/475 for part demolition and alterations and additions to an existing single storey dwelling and associated works at premises known as 59 Louisa Road Birchgrove, subject to the conditions annexed and marked with the letter "A".
3 The exhibits, except exhibits 9 and D, be returned.
4 No order as to costs.
________________________
Annelise Tuor
Commissioner of the Court
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.