NSW Caselaw
> Reported Decision : (2003) 131 LGERA 434
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : The Council of the City of Gosford v Tauszik [2003] NSWLEC 354 PROSECUTOR The Council of the City of Gosford PARTIES : DEFENDANT Anthony John Tauszik FILE NUMBER(S) : 50001 of 2003 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- whether the summons is statute barred - whether the consent required under the Ordinance and Tree Preservation Order is development consent as defined in s 4 of the EP&A Act - whether the offence falls in the first or second category of offence in s 125(1) of the EP&A Act - whether the summons discloses all the necessary ingredients of the offence Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 4, s 26, s 76A, s 125, s127 LEGISLATION CITED: Gosford Planning Scheme Ordinance cl 44 Gosford City Council Tree Preservation Order cl 2 Cameron v Lake Macquarie City Council (2000) 107 LGERA 308; Cooper v Coffs Harbour City Council (1997) 97 LGERA 125; Dames and Moore Pty Ltd v Byron Council [2000] NSWLEC 46; CASES CITED: Hornsby Shire Council v Clyne (Talbot J, NSWLEC, 29 October 1998, unreported); Hornsby Shire Council v Winsloe (1998) 101 LGERA 117; Meriton Apartments Pty Ltd v Ryde City Council (1998) 108 LGERA 352; Rao v Canterbury City Council (2000) 112 LGERA 360 DATES OF HEARING: 23-24/09/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 12/19/2003
PROSECUTOR Mr M Fraser (barrister) SOLICITORS PJ Donnellan & Co
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate