NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v McConnell Dowell Constructors (Australia) Pty Ltd [2002] NSWLEC 202 PROSECUTOR Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : DEFENDANT McConnell Dowell Constructors (Australia) Pty Ltd FILE NUMBER(S) : 50009 of 1999 CORAM: Pearlman J KEY ISSUES: Evidence :- admissibility - record of interview - whether an admission - whether discretion to exclude should be exercised - authority to make admission - whether admission improperly obtained - failure of investigator to give full caution Clean Waters Act 1970 s 16(1) LEGISLATION CITED: Evidence Act 1995 s 81, s 87, s 90, s 138, s 139, s 187 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 216 CASES CITED: Papakosmas v The Queen (1999) 196 CLR 297; Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass (1972) AC 153 DATES OF HEARING: 05/11/2002; 07/11/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/12/2002
PROSECUTOR Mr D A Buchanan SC with Mrs J Kelly (Barrister) SOLICITORS Environment Protection Authority LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT Mr J L Glissan QC with Mr G B Newport (Barrister) SOLICITORS Doyles Construction Lawyers
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 50009 of 1999 Pearlman J 12 November 2002 ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY Prosecutor v McCONNELL DOWELL CONSTRUCTORS (AUSTRALIA) PTY LTD Defendant Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate