NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Paul Monteleone v Ryde City Council [2005] NSWLEC 549
APPLICANT: Paul Monteleone PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Ryde City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10745 of 2005
CORAM: Watts C at 1
Development Application :- Social and economic impacts in the locality KEY ISSUES: Desired future character of the locality and proximity to sensitive land uses Public interest.
Ryde Planning Scheme Ordinance 1979, (RPSO) LEGISLATION CITED: Draft Ryde Local Environmental Plan No. 123, (DLEP123) and · Draft Ryde Development Control Plan No 40, (DDCP40)
Broad v Brisbane City Council (1986) 59 LGRA 296; Dixon v Burwood Council [2002] NSWLEC 190; Jim Marinos v Ashfield Municipal Council [2005] NSWLEC 2; Liu v Fairfield Council [1996] NSWLEC 272 ; Lonza v Fairfield City Council, (Unreported decision dated 9 December 1996); Markakis v Ashfield Municipal Council [2004] NSWLEC 383; CASES CITED: Martyn v Hornsby Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 614; Mortimer v Sutherland Shire Council [2005] NSWLEC 349; New Century Developments Pty Limited v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2003] NSWLEC 154; Perry Properties Pty Limited v Ashfield Council (No 2) [2001] NSWLEC 62; Venus Enterprises Pty Limited v Parramatta City Council (1981) 43 LGRA 67; Zhang v Ashfield Municipal Council [2001] NSWCA 167
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate