NSW Caselaw
> Reported Decision : 128 LGERA 169
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Central West Environment Council Inc. v Orange City Council And Anor [2003] NSWLEC 131 APPLICANT: PARTIES : Central West Environment Council Inc. RESPONDENT: Orange City Council And Anor FILE NUMBER(S) : 40445 of 2002 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- validity challenged on alternative bases that development application not accompanied by SIS (jurisdictional fact) and Consent authority in granting consent erred on "Wednesbury" grounds and that development consent was uncertain. LEGISLATION CITED: Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation (1948) 1 KB 223; Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321; Boughey v The Queen (1986) 161 CLR 10; Bruce v Cole (1998) 45 NSWLR 163; Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission (1999) 199 CLR 135; CASES CITED: Mahon v Air New Zealand (1984) AC 808; Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act v Deerubbin Local Aboriginal Land Council (No 2) (2001) 50 NSWLR 665; NSW Land and Housing Corporation v Campbelltown City Council (2002) NSWLEC 18; Plumb v Penrith City Council (2002) NSWLEC 223; Reg v Hillingdon London Borough Council: Ex parte Puhlhofer (1986) AC 484; Timbarra Protection Inc v Ross Mining NL (1999) 102 LGERA 52; Weal v Bathurst City Council (2000) 111 LGERA 181 DATES OF HEARING: 12-14/02/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/27/2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate