NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Nasser v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales Millstar Holdings Pty Limited v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2006] NSWLEC 100
APPLICANTS Fred Nasser Michael Nasser PARTIES : George Nasser Millstar Holdings Pty Ltd
RESPONDENT Road and Traffic Authority of New South Wales
FILE NUMBER(S) : 30162 of 2003; 30163 of 2003
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- Application to reopen following close of hearing
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s38(2)
Coulton v Holcombe (1986) 162 CLR 1; De L v Director-General, NSW Department of Community Services (No 2) (1997) 190 CLR 207; CASES CITED: Lalic v Roads & Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2005] NSWLEC 430; Metwally (No 2) v University of Wollongong (1985) 60 ALR 68 ; Mir Bros Unit Constructions Pty Limited v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2005] NSWLEC 419; Urban Transport Authority of New South Wales v Nweiser (1992) 28 NSWLR 471
DATES OF HEARING: 17/02/06
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/03/2006
APPLICANTS P McEwen SC A Pickles SOLICITOR LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Allens Arthur Robinson RESPONDENT J Maston SOLICITOR Corrs Chambers Westgarth
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate