NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Mangos and Anor. v Fairfield City Council [2003] NSWLEC 453 APPLICANTS: Mangos and Anor. PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Fairfield City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10442 of 2002 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- Application by Respondent for costs in Class 1 proceedings where those proceedings were discontinued by Applicant LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 96 Gormick Constructions Pty Limited v City of Sydney Council [2002] NSWLEC 130 1 August 2002); Joanou v Randwick City Council 105 LGERA 237; CASES CITED: Manly Wharf Proprietary Limited v Manly Council (1998) LGERA 245; Menangle Sand and Soil v Wingecarribee Shire Council 108 LGERA 209; Re Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs of the Commonwealth of Australia, Ex Parte Lai Qin 186 CLR 622 DATES OF HEARING: 27/06/2003 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 06/27/2003
APPLICANTS: Mr M Baird, Barrister SOLICITORS Australian Town Planning Consultants LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr A J J Thompson, Barrister SOLICITORS Kencalo and Ritchie
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
BIGNOLD J
27 June 2003
10442 of 2002 MANGOS & ANOR v FAIRFIELD CITY COUNCIL
JUDGMENT
HIS HONOUR 1. This is an application for costs made by the Council in class 1 proceedings which were discontinued in the Court by the filing of a Notice of Discontinuance by the Applicant to the class 1 proceedings.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate