NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Brigden v Parry Council [2004] NSWLEC 386 FIRST APPLICANT Edward John Brigden SECOND APPLICANT Anthony Wayne Chaffey PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Parry Shire Council SECOND RESPONDENT Baida Poultry Pty Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 10071 of 2003 CORAM: Brown C Development Application :- designated development KEY ISSUES: poultry sheds odour Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000 Parry Local Environmental Plan 1987 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 22/03/04, 10/06/04 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/23/2004
FIRST / SECOND APPLICANT Mr C McEwen, barrister SOLICITORS Robilliard and Robilliard
FIRST RESPONDENT Mr C Zoppo, solicitor LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SOLICITORS Sparke and Helmore
SECOND RESPONDENT Mr J Robson, barrister SOLICITORS Maclarens
JUDGMENT:
THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Commissioner G T Brown
23 July 2004
10071 of 2003
Edward John Brigden First Applicant Anthony Wayne Chaffey Second Applicant v Parry Shire Council First Respondent Baida Poultry Pty Limited Second Respondent
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate