Farburn Holdings v Botanyn Bay City Council [2006] NSWLEC 689
NSW Caselaw
Full text
Select any passage to save a personal note with optional tags.
Land and Environment Court
of New South Wales
CITATION : Farburn Holdings v Botanyn Bay City Council [2006] NSWLEC 689
Applicant:
Farburn Holdings Pty Ltd
PARTIES :
Respondent:
Botany Bay City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10531 of 2006
CORAM: Roseth SC
KEY ISSUES: Development Application - Subdivision :-
DATES OF HEARING: 02/11/2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11/02/2006
Applicant:
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr W Carney, barrister instructed by Mr H Husseini of H K Husseini & Co solicitors
Respondent:
Mr T O'Connor, solicitor of Houston Dearn O'Connor
JUDGMENT:
- 2 -
THE LAND AND
ENVIRONMENT COURT
OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Roseth SC
2 November 2006
10531 of 2006 Farburn Holdings Pty Ltd v Botany Bay City Council
JUDGMENT
1 Senior Commissioner: This is an appeal against the refusal by Botany Bay City Council (the council) of a development application to subdivide under Strata title two factories at 36-38 Sir Joseph Banks Drive, Botany.
2 The council had three objections to the original application:
· The subdivision was a straight line;
· There were only six parking spaces for each factory;
· Vehicles could not exit in a forward direction.
3 The applicant amended its proposal to meet each of these objections. As a result the council agreed to the seeking of consent orders from the Court. There were no objectors to the application. The Court agrees to the request.
Consent orders
1. The appeal is upheld.
2. Development application 06/073 lodged with the Botany Bay City Council for Strata subdivision at 36-38 Sir Joseph Banks Drive, Botany is determined by the grant of consent subject to the conditions in Annexure A.
3. The exhibits are retained on the Court's files.
_______________
Dr John Roseth
Senior Commissioner
DISCLAIMER - Every effort has been made to comply with suppression orders or statutory provisions prohibiting publication that may apply to this judgment or decision. The onus remains on any person using material in the judgment or decision to ensure that the intended use of that material does not breach any such order or provision. Further enquiries may be directed to the Registry of the Court or Tribunal in which it was generated.
Related laws
No related documents linked yet.
You've got 21 of 22 free Acts left this visit. Sign up anytime for Facts, Related, and study briefs too.