NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Gallanos v Canterbury City Council [2007] NSWLEC 162
APPLICANT Jim and Elizabeth Gallanos PARTIES : RESPONDENT Canterbury City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10252 of 2006
CORAM: Tuor C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- demolish all existing structures and construct a two-storey attached dual occupancy with basement car park bulk and number of storeys, impact on streetscape
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Canterbury Planning Scheme Ordinance Development Control Plan 14
DATES OF HEARING: 18/10/06 and 2/03/07
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 2 March 2007
APPLICANT Mr S Kondilios, solicitor SOLICITORS Maddocks LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr A Seton, solicitor SOLICITORS Marsdens Law Group
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Tuor C
2 March 2007
10252 of 2006 Jim and Elizabeth Gallanos v Canterbury City Council
JUDGMENT 1 COMMISSIONER: This is an appeal against the refusal by Canterbury City Council (the Council) of a development application (1072 of 2004) to demolish all existing structures and construct a two-storey attached dual occupancy with basement garages at No 1 Bobadah Street Kingsgrove (the site). The site, its context, the history of the application and the statutory controls are in the Statement of Basic Facts.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate