NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : (2002) 125 LGERA 138
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Falkiner v Director-General of Planning NSW and Ors [2002] NSWLEC 159 APPLICANT Brereton Skerrett Falkiner
FIRST RESPONDENT Director-General of Planning NSW PARTIES : SECOND RESPONDENT Yarrowlumla Shire Council
THIRD RESPONDENT Minister for Planning FILE NUMBER(S) : 40048 of 2002 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Judicial Review :- whether Yarrowlumla Local Environmental Plan 2002 is void - power of the Director-General to impose conditions on Council during making of LEP - scope of regime under Part 3 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - whether conditions imposed by the Director-General were s 65(2) conditions under the EP&A Act - whether s 65(2) conditions can be subsequently altered - whether draft local environmental plan was submitted within the meaning of s 64 of the EP&A Act - whether s 74 applies to the repeal and replacement of LEPs - whether an environmental study under s 57 was required - whether the Director-General must make a determination as to whether an environmental study is required under s 74 - whether denial of procedural fairness - whether failure to take relevant considerations into account - whether failure to take into account relevant considerations - whether improper purpose - whether manifest unreasonableness Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 54, s 57, s 62, s 64, s 65, s 66, s 67, s 68, s 69, s 70, s 74 LEGISLATION CITED: Interpretation Act 1987 s 48(1) Yarrowlumla Local Environmental Plan 1993 Yarrowlumla Local Environmental Plan 2002 Attorney General (NSW) v Quin (1990) 170 CLR 1; Canterbury District Residents and Ratepayers Association Inc v Canterbury Municipal Council (1991) 73 LGRA 317; Curac v Shoalhaven City Council and Anor (1993) 81 LGERA 124; Helman v Byron Shire Council (1995) 87 LGERA 349; John Brown Lenton & Co Pty Ltd v Minister for Urban Affairs and Planning & Ors (1999) 106 LGERA 150; CASES CITED: Litevale Pty Ltd v Lismore City Council (1997) 96 LGERA 91; Minister for Aboriginal Affairs v Peko-Wallsend Ltd (1986) 162 CLR 24; Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Bhardwaj (2002) 76 ALJR 598; Project Blue Sky Inc & Ors v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355; Sloane v The Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs (1992) 37 FCR 429; Vanmeld Pty Limited v Fairfield City Council (1999) 46 NSWLR 78; WD Marketing Services Limited v G Kibble & Anor (Cripps J, NSWLEC, 1 November 1989, unreported) DATES OF HEARING: 31/05/2002, 17/06/2002, 25/07/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/26/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate