NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Ristevski v Hurstville City Council [2003] NSWLEC 409 APPELLANT Zivko Ristevski PARTIES : RESPONDENT Hurstville City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 60006 of 2003 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- against sentence imposed by local court - limit in lower court relates only to jurisdiction and not maximum penalty Evidence :- leave given to rely on fresh evidence on appeal Crimes (Local Courts Appeal and Review) Act 2001 s 37(1), s 37(2), s 39, s 39(2), s 49, s 70 LEGISLATION CITED: Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 s 10 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 76A CASES CITED: R v Munday (1981) 2 NSWLR 177; R v Thomson (2000) NSWLR 383 DATES OF HEARING: 26/11/2003 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11/26/2003
APPELLANT Ms L Byrne (Barrister) SOLICITORS R J Walsh Murphy & Roskov LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms K J Eggleton-Ozen (Solicitor) SOLICITORS Deacons
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 60006 of 2003
Talbot J
26 November 2003 Zivko Ristevski Appellant v Hurstville City Council Respondent Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate