NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Corben Architects v Gosford City Council [2006] NSWLEC 500
Applicant: Corben Architects PARTIES : Respondent: Gosford City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10333 of 2006
CORAM: Roseth SC
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :-
DATES OF HEARING: 28/08/2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 08/28/2006
Applicant: LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr S Kondilios, solicitor of Maddocks Lawyers Respondent: Ms P Wright, solicitor of P J Donnellan & Co
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Roseth SC
28 August 2006
10333 of 2006 Corben Architects v Gosford City Council
JUDGMENT 1 Senior Commissioner: This is an appeal against the refusal by Gosford City Council of a development application for alterations and additions to lot 245 DP 15679, known as 8 Macdonald Street, Killcare Heights. The issue in the matter was the view impact affecting Nos 70, 70A and 72 Manly View Road. Following the council's refusal the parties negotiated with the result that the Applicant reduced the height of the building by 200mm. While the proposal does not fully comply with the requirement in Development Control Plan 155 (DCP 155) that the upper floor be a maximum of 4m above natural ground, this breach has no relevance to view obstruction. The roof of the proposal is much lower than the maximum of 10m above natural ground level required by DCP 155. 2 I have assessed the view impact from Nos 70 and 70A Manly View Road after hearing the evidence of Mr and Mrs Edema (NO 70A) and Mrs Aitken-Jones (No 70). I agree with the parties that the view impact is reasonable. I therefore agree to the request for consent orders.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate