NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Australand v Sutherland Shire Council [2004] NSWLEC 9 Australand Holdings Ltd PARTIES : Applicant Sutherland Shire Council Respondent FILE NUMBER(S) : 10123 and ; 10124 of 2000 CORAM: Roseth SC - Hoffman C Development Application - Planning Instruments - Subdivision :- Green and Golden Bell Frog vulnerable ecological communities KEY ISSUES: groundwater quality groundwater dependent ecosystems revegetation of mobile dune system LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 14/10/2003 to 20/10/2003, 22/10/2003 to 31/10/2003, 28/11/2003, 05/12/2003 and 24/12/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 01/23/2004
Applicant: Mr B Preston SC Ms S Pritchard, barrister instructed by G Cummins of Cowley Hearne Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Respondent: Mr T Robertson SC Mr P Larkin, barrister instructed by Mr B Woolf of Woolf Associates
JUDGMENT: - 2 - IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 10123 and 10124 of 2000
Roseth SC Hoffman C
23 January 2004 Australand Holdings Ltd Applicant v Sutherland Shire Council Respondent Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate