NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : [2005] NSWCA 169 (2006) LGERA 460
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hunter Development and Brokerage Pty Ltd v Cessnock City Council [2005] NSWLEC 727
APPLICANT: Hunter Development and Brokerage Pty Ltd
PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Cessnock City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11564 of 2003
CORAM: Bignold J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- in class 1 proceedings—normative approach that there be no costs should be applied
Rules of Court LEGISLATION CITED: Part 16 Rule 4
Broadwater Action Group Inc v Richmond Valley Council (No 2) (2003) 129 LGERA 401; Gee v Port Stephens Council; (2003) 131 LGERA 325; CASES CITED: MacDonald v Mosman Municipal Council (No 2) (2000) 107 LGERA 211; Outdoor Australia v Auburn Council (1996) 89 LGERA 365; Smith v Wyong Council (1984) 53 LGRA 170
DATES OF HEARING: 16/12/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 16/12/2005
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 16/12/2005
APPLICANT: Mr J Kildea, Barrister SOLICITORS Thompson Norrie LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT: Ms J Jagot, Barrister SOLICITORS Cleaves Mallick Gibbs
JUDGMENT:
test THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate