NSW Caselaw
> Reported Decision : 125 LGERA 104
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Scharer v State of New South Wales [2003] NSWLEC 23 APPLICANT Scharer PARTIES : RESPONDENT State of New South Wales FILE NUMBER(S) : 40019 of 2002 CORAM: Pearlman J KEY ISSUES: Estoppel :- proprietary estoppel - Crown land - catchment area - whether Water Board is or represents the Crown - right of way Conveyancing Act 1919 s 68(1), s 178 LEGISLATION CITED: Crown Lands Consolidation Act 1913 s 6, s 55(4) Metropolitan Water Sewerage and Drainage Act 1924 s 56A National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 s 153(3) Chalmers v Pardoe (1963) 3 All E R 552; Clancy and Anor v Salienta Pty Ltd and Ors [2000] NSWCA 248; Crabb v Arun District Council [1976] 1 Ch 179; Fensom and Anor v Cootamundra Racecourse Reserve Trust and Ors [2000] NSWSC 1072; Giumelli and Anor v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101; Hill v AWJ Moore & Co Pty Ltd (1990) 5 BPR 11359; Inwards and Ors v Baker [1965] 2 QB 29; CASES CITED: Plimmer and Anor v The Mayor of Wellington (1884) 9 App Cas 699; Ramsden v Dyson (1866) LR 1 HL 129; Scharer v State of New South Wales (2000) 111 LGERA 124; Scharer v State of New South Wales (2001) 53 NSWLR 299; Sydney City Council v Reid (1994) 34 NSWLR 506; The Commonwealth of Australia v Verwayen (1990) 170 CLR 394 ; Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd v Maher and Anor (1988) 164 CLR 387; Wood v Browne (1984) 2 Qd R 593 DATES OF HEARING: 02/12/2002; 03/12/2002; 19/02/2003; 05/03/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 03/07/2003
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate