NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Stockland Developments v Wollongong Council and others [2004] NSWLEC 470 APPLICANT Stockland Developments Pty Limited
FIRST RESPONDENT PARTIES : Wollongong City Council
SECOND RESPONDENT Cookson Priblico Pty Limited
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10210 of 2004 CORAM: Roseth SC - Brown C Development Application :- resubdivision of existing six lots KEY ISSUES: erection of 18 dwellings subdivision into 19 community title lots impact of noise from adjoining factory LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 CASES CITED: Carriage v Stockland (Constructors) [2002] NSWLEC 117 DATES OF HEARING: 11-13/08/04, 18/08/04 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/27/2004
APPLICANT Mr M Craig SC SOLICITORS Baker & McKenzie
FIRST RESPONDENT Mr J Ayling SC LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SOLICITORS Phillips Fox
SECOND RESPONDENT Mr B Preston SC SOLICITORS Pike, Pike and Fenwick
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Roseth SC Brown C
27 August 2004
10210 of 2004 Stockland Development Pty Ltd (Applicant) v Wollongong City Council (First Respondent) and Cookson Priblico Pty Ltd (Second Respondent)
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate