NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Renaldo Plus 3 Pty Limited v Hurstville City Council [No 2] [2005] NSWLEC 590
APPLICANT: Renaldo Plus 3 Pty Limited PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Hurstville City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11591 of 2004
CORAM: Pain J
KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- s 56A appeal - finality of development consent - whether failure to consider impact on character - whether failure to give sufficient reasons
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 79C LEGISLATION CITED: Hurstville Local Environmental Plan 1994 Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 56A
Beale v Government Insurance Office of NSW (1997) 48 NSWLR 430; Brimbella Pty Limited v Mosman Municipal Council (1985) 79 LGERA 367; Coles v Woollahra Municipal Council (1986) 59 LGRA 133; Farnworth Holdings Pty Limited v Botany Bay Council [2003] NSWLEC 177; Mison v Randwick Municipal Council (1991) 23 NSWLR 734; CASES CITED: Oshlack v Richmond River Shire Council & Anor (1993) 82 LGERA 222; Randwick Municipal Council v Crawley (1986) 60 LGRA 277; Renaldo Plus 3 Pty Limited v Hurstville City Council [2005] NSWLEC 315; Segal & Anor v Waverley Council [2005] NSWCA 310; Transport Action Group Against Motorways Inc v Roads & Traffic Authority (1999) 46 NSWLR 598
DATES OF HEARING: 17/10/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 11/01/2005
APPLICANT: Mr I Hemmings (barrister) SOLICITORS: Heidtman & Co LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr S Austin QC SOLICITORS: Deacons
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate