NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Lean Lackenby & Haywood Liverpool Pty Limited v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2003] NSWLEC 406 PARTIES : Lean Lackenby & Haywood Liverpool Pty Limited Baulkham Hills Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11021 of 2001 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- preliminary question of law - Class 1 appeal - whether council statute barred from challenging condition in its original development consent - validity of consent condition requiring the purchase of land by council LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act (1979) s 80A, s 94, s 96 and s 101 Land and Environment Court Act (1979) s 39(2) MLC Properties v Camden Council (1997) 96 LGERA 52; CASES CITED: Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578; R v Hickman; Ex parte Fox v Clinton (1945) 70 CLR 598; Yadle Investments Pty Limited v RTA (1991) 72 LGRA 409 DATES OF HEARING: 30/10/03 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11/04/2003
APPLICANT: Mr J Ayling SC SOLICITORS: Storey and Gough LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: Mr A. Galasso SOLICITORS: Coleman and Greig
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 11021 of 2001
Pain J
4 November 2003 LEAN LACKENBY & HAYWOOD LIVERPOOL PTY LIMITED Applicant v BAULKHAM HILLS SHIRE COUNCIL Respondent Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate