NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Stonecost Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2003] NSWLEC 315 APPLICANT Stonecost Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Manly Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10610 of 2003 CORAM: Hussey C KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Section 96 modification - hotel operating hours LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act Manly Local Environmental Plan CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 19, 20 November 2003 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11/21/2003
APPLICANT Mr A J Thompson, barrister SOLICITORS Brook Worthington LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr W O'Rourke, solicitor SOLICITORS Deacons
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 10610 of 2003
Hussey C
21 November 2003 Stonecost Pty Ltd Applicant
v Manly Council Respondent Judgment Background 1 This matter involves an appeal against council's refusal to allow a s 96(2) modification to a condition of consent relating to the hours operation for approved alterations and extensions to the Steyne Hotel at Manly.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate