NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Millett v Leichhardt Council [2007] NSWLEC 10
APPLICANT Brendan Millett PARTIES : RESPONDENT Leichhardt Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10330 of 2006 and ; 10827 of 2006
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Section 96 modification for late night trading premises, noise, traffic, parking
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act Leichhardt Local Environmental Plan
Vinson v Randwick Council [2005] NSWLEC 142; CASES CITED: Randall Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Council [2004] NSWLEC 277; Rifon Pty Ltd v Sydney City Council [2006] NSWLEC 778
DATES OF HEARING: 02/03-11/2006
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 15 January 2007
APPLICANT Dr S Berveling, barrister SOLICITORS S Walker & Associates LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr G Green, solicitor SOLICITORS Pike Pike & Fenwick
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
15 January 2007
10330 and 10827 of 2006 Brendan Millett v Leichhardt Council
JUDGMENT Background 1 These proceedings comprise two appeals arising out of council's refusal to grant s 96 Modifications for the development and use of a commercial/residential property situated at 732 - 735 Darling Street, Rozelle. The property is known as "The Barn".
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate