NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Cracknell Lonergan v Sydney City Council [2005] NSWLEC 68
APPLICANT Cracknell Lonergan
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sydney City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11020 of 2004
CORAM: Nott C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Consent orders relating to the redevelopment of commercial and residential premises - all requiremnts of council met - impact on residential amenity acceptable.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
DATES OF HEARING: 28 January and 21 February 2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 02/21/2005
APPLICANT Mr M Ball, agent
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr Stan Kondilios, solicitor SOLICITORS Maddocks
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Nott C
21 February 2005
11020 of 2004 Cracknell Lonergan v Sydney City Council
JUDGMENT 1 This is an appeal against the council's refusal of a development application relating to the redevelopment of 293 Riley Street, Surry Hills. The matter came on for hearing before me in the Court at which time the council had agreed to the Court granting a development consent. Objectors had been notified and there are no objectors in the Court at that time. All the requirements and modifications sought of the original development had been implemented in the plans that were tendered before me and were completely acceptable to the council.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate