NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Christopher & Mary Borg v Sam & Jan Ellul [2006] NSWLEC 620
APPLICANTS Christopher and Mary Borg PARTIES : RESPONDENTS Sam and Jan Ellul
FILE NUMBER(S) : 41041 of 2005
CORAM: Jagot J
KEY ISSUES: Costs :- Consent orders with respect to substantive issues - only remaining issue one of costs - neither party surrendered to the other - no disentitling conduct - each party ordered to pay its own costs
LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69
Australian Securities Commission v Aust-Home Investments Limited and Others (1993) 44 FCR 194; CASES CITED: Kiama Council v Grant (2006) 143 LGERA 441; One.Tel Ltd and Others v Commissioner of Taxation (2000) 101 FCR 548; Re The Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs of the Commonwealth of Australia; Ex Parte Lai Qin (1997) 186 CLR 622
DATES OF HEARING: 03/08/2006
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 08/03/2006
APPLICANT Mr E Ozen SOLICITORS Cumberland Frank Commercial Lawyers LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr C Gough (solicitor) SOLICITORS Storey & Gough
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Jagot J
3 August 2006
41041 of 2005
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate