NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Doueihi v Randwick City Council [2005] NSWLEC 527
APPLICANT: Michel Doueihi
PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Randwick City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10732 of 2005
CORAM: Lloyd J
Existing Use Rights :- factual determination of whether existing use rights extend to whole site or part thereof KEY ISSUES:
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (NSW), ss 97, 106 Environmental Planning and Assessment Regulation 2000, Pt 5 LEGISLATION CITED: County of Cumberland Planning Scheme Ordinance, cl 24, sub-cl 26(b) and (c), 31((b)(ii) Randwick Local Environmental Plan 1998, sub-cll 10(2), (3) and (4), cll 26, 49, Schedule 1 Randwick Planning Scheme Ordinance, cl 31; sub-cll 4(1), 24(a) and (d), and 89(c)
Armstrong v Ashfield Municipal Council (2002) 124 LGERA 189; Dorrestijn v South Australian Planning Commission (1984) 59 ALJR 105; Eaton & Sons Pty Limited v Warringah Shire Council (1972) 129 CLR 270; Lemworth Pty Ltd v Liverpool City Council (2001) 53 NSWLR 371; Mona Vale Pty Ltd v Pittwater Council (2003) 124 LGERA 449; CASES CITED: North Sydney Municipal Council v Boyts Radio and Electrical Pty Ltd (1998) 67 LGRA 344; Parramatta City Council v Brickworks Limited (1972) 128 CLR 1; Royal Agricultural Society of New South Wales v Sydney City Council (1987) 61 LGERA 305; Shire of Perth v O'Keefe (1964) 110 CLR 529; Steedman v Baulkham Hills Shire Council (1991) 87 LGERA 26; Woollahra Municipal Council v Banool Developments Pty Ltd (1973) 129 CLR 138
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate