NSW Caselaw
> Pending Appeal :
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Goulburn Wool Scour Pty Limited (No 2) [2003] NSWLEC 231 PROSECUTOR Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : DEFENDANT Goulburn Wool Scour Pty Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 50003 of 2003 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- application to state a case after announcement of verdict LEGISLATION CITED: Criminal Appeal Act 1912 s 5AE, s 5A(2), s 5A(3) Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997 s 122 Bropho v Western Australia (1990) 171 CLR 1; Morrison v Peacock and Roslyn Shipping Company Pty Ltd (2000) 108 LGERA 77 Morrison v Peacock and Another (2000) NSWLR 178; R v Cheng (1999) 48 NSWLR 616; CASES CITED: R v Essex Justices; Ex Parte Final [1963] 2 QB 816; R v Thomas Anthony Vincent [2002] NSWCCA 110, unreported; Reg v Lazarevic (1967) 85 WN (Pt 1) (NSW) 189; Ward v Williams (1955) 92 CLR 496 DATES OF HEARING: 09/09/2003, 23/09/2003, 03/10/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/10/2003
PROSECUTOR Mr T G Howard (Barrister) SOLICITORS Environment Protection Authority LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: DEFENDANT Mr C J Leggat (Barrister) with Mr J A Crisp (Barrister) SOLICITORS Phillips Fox
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate