NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Kentucky Fried Chicken Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2003] NSWLEC 415 APPLICANT Kentucky Fried Chicken Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10393 of 2003 CORAM: Murrell C KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX Environmental Planning and Assessment Act LEGISLATION CITED: State Environmental Planning Policy Nos. 64 and 55 Planning Scheme Ordinance CASES CITED: Tower Terraces Development v Sutherland Council DATES OF HEARING: 26/08/2003 - 29/08/2003, 05/09/2003 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 11/14/2003
APPLICANT Mr J E Robson, barrister SOLICITOR Eakin McCaffery Cox LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr S B Austin, QC SOLICITORS Abbott Tout
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALESI
10393 of 2003 Murrell C 14 November 2003
Kentucky Fried Chicken Pty Ltd Applicant v Ku-ring-gai Council Respondent Judgment
1. This is an appeal under s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act against Ku-ring-gai Council's refusal of a development application for a Kentucky Fried Chicken drive-in/eat-in restaurant at 684 Pacific Highway, Killara. Initially it was a deemed refusal however the council resolved on 12 August to refuse the development application.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate