NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Urbis Pty Ltd v Sutherland Shire Council [2002] NSWLEC 20 APPLICANT Urbis Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Sutherland Shire Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10774 of 2000 CORAM: Pearlman J KEY ISSUES: Appeal :- s 56A - take into consideration - development control plan - traffic Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 79C(1)(a)(iii) LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 56A Sutherland Shire Development Control Plan Heathcote Precinct 3 CASES CITED: Zhang v Canterbury City Council (2001) 115 LGERA 373 DATES OF HEARING: 15/02/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 02/28/2002
APPLICANT Mr C W McEwen (Barrister) SOLICITORS Mallesons Stephen Jaques LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr D P Wilson (Barrister) SOLICITORS Sutherland Shire Council
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND 10774 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT Pearlman J OF NEW SOUTH WALES 28 February 2002
URBIS PTY LTD Applicant v SUTHERLAND SHIRE COUNCIL Respondent
JUDGMENT
Introduction
1. This is an appeal under s 56A of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 brought by Sutherland Shire Council against the decision of Commissioner Roseth (now Senior Commissioner) to grant development consent to a development application for a McDonald's Restaurant and drive through take-away at 1264 - 1268 Princes Highway, Heathcote ("the site").
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate