NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Evans and Anor. v Maclean Shire Council and Anor. [2004] NSWLEC 512 APPLICANT: Evans and Anor. PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Maclean Shire Council and Anor. FILE NUMBER(S) : 41468 of 2003 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Development Consent :- challenge to validity on ground that the council granting it was not the relevant consent authority-whether approved development was State significant development if consent was granted pursuant to existing use entitlements LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 76A(7) State Environmental Planning Policy No 71 - Coastal Protection Carden v Willoughby Municipal Council (1985) 56 LGRA 366; Chambers v Maclean Shire Council (2003) 126 LGERA 7; Currey v Sutherland Shire Council (2003) 129 LGERA 223; CASES CITED: Golden Fleece Petroleum Pty Ltd v Rockdale Municipal Council (1984) 52 LGRA 202; Hurstville Municipal Council v Bindon (1981) 45 LGRA 420; Johns v Australian Securities Commission (1993) 178 CLR 408; Jones v Sutherland Shire Council (1979) 40 LGRA 323; The Minister for Urban Affairs v Rosemount Estates Pty Ltd (1996) 91 LGERA 31 DATES OF HEARING: 17/08/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/09/2004
APPLICANT: Mr C J Leggat, Barrister with A E Maroya, Barrister SOLICITORS Environmental Defender's Office
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate