NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Environment Protection Authority v Barrett [2003] NSWLEC 182 PROSECUTOR: Environment Protection Authority PARTIES : DEFENDANT: Justin Andrew Barrett FILE NUMBER(S) : 50101 of 2002 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Prosecution :- Penalty and costs Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999, s9 Fines Act 1996, ss4, 6 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s52 Protection of the Environment Operations Act 1997, ss116(1), 119, 120, Roads and Rail Transport (Dangerous Goods) Act 1997, s35 Environment Protection Authority v Coggins [2003] NSWLEC 111; CASES CITED: Environment Protection Authority v Hopley [2003] NSWLEC 112; Latoudis v Casey (1990) 170 CLR 534 DATES OF HEARING: 06/08/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/06/2003
APPLICANT: S Rushton QC SOLICITOR: Environment Protection Authority LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT: D Evenden (Solicitor) Legal Aid NSW
JUDGMENT: - 11 - IN THE LAND AND 50101 of 2002 ENVIRONMENT COURT Bignold J OF NEW SOUTH WALES 6 August 2003
ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION AUTHORITY Prosecutor v JUSTIN ANDREW BARRETT Defendant Judgment
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate