NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Westfield Management Limited & Ors v Direct Factory Outlets Homebush Pty Limited & Ors [2004] NSWLEC 327 APPLICANTS Westfield Management Limited GPT Management Limited Centro Properties Limited Stockland Trust Management Limited PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Direct Factory Outlets Homebush Pty Limited SECOND RESPONDENT Sanity Music Stores Pty Limited FOURTH RESPONDENT Colorado Group Limited t/as Mathers Shoes FILE NUMBER(S) : 40871 of 2002 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- Application for summary dismissal/strike out of proceedings - Whether Applicants' case as pleaded discloses a cause of action against the Respondents Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules, Pt 9 r 4(1), Pt 15 r 3(1), Pt 15 r 5(1) Supreme Court Rules, Pt 31 r 2 Fastbuck$ v Dudley Pastoral Co Pty Ltd and Ors (2003) NSWCA 126; CASES CITED: General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner of Railways (NSW) & Ors (1964) 112 CLR 125; Patrick Stevedores Operations No 2 Pty Ltd v Maritime Union of Australia [No 3] (1998) 195 CLR; Wilkie v Blacktown City Council (2992) 121 LGERA 444 17/06/2004 18/06/2004 DATES OF HEARING: 21/06/2004 22/06/2004 23/06/2004 24/06/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/25/2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate