NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Engadine Area Traffic Action Group Inc v Sutherland Shire Council & Anor (No. 2) [2004] NSWLEC 434 APPLICANT: Engadine Area Traffic Action Group Inc
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT: Sutherland Shire Council
SECOND RESPONDENT: Wallis & Moore Pty Limited FILE NUMBER(S) : 40087 of 2004 CORAM: Lloyd J Costs :- unsuccessful applicant - public interest litigation - novel matter requiring interpretation and future administration of the law - special circumstances - no order as to costs KEY ISSUES: Costs: - indemnity costs - relevant considerations LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 69(2) Anglo Cyprian Trade Agencies Ltd v Paphof Wine Industries Ltd [1951] 1 All ER 873; Botany Municipal Council v Department of Arts, Sport and Environment (1992) 34 FCR 412; Broadwater Action Group Inc v Richmond Valley Council (No. 2) (2003) 129 LGERA 401; Darlinghurst Residents' Association v Elarosa Investments Pty Ltd (No. 3) (1992) 75 LGRA 214; Degman Ltd v Wright (No. 2) (1983) 2 NSWLR 354; Engadine Area Traffic Action Group v Sutherland Shire Council & Anor [2004] NSWLEC 127; Engadine Area Traffic Action Group v Sutherland Shire Council & Anor [2004] NSWLEC 264; Fountain Selected Meats (Sales) Pty Ltd v International Produce Merchants Pty Ltd (1988) 81 ALR 397,; Friends of Hay Street Inc v Hastings Council (1995) 87 LGERA 44; CASES CITED: Friends of Hinchinbrook Society Inc v Minister for the Environment (No. 5) (1998) 99 LGERA 140; Hofer v Howell (2001) 113 LGERA 391; Kennedy v Director-General of National Parks & Wildlife Service (2002) 121 LGERA 84 ; Liverpool City Council v Roads & Traffic Authority & Interlink (No. 2) (1992) 75 LGRA 210; Maule v Liporoni (No. 2) (2002) 122 LGERA 216; Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1994) 82 LGERA 236; Plumb v Penrith City Council (2003) 126 LGERA 109; Rosniak v Government Insurance Office (1997) 41 NSWLR 608; Rundle v Tweed Shire Council (No. 2) (1989) 69 LGRA 21 DATES OF HEARING: 15/07/2004 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 08/13/2004
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate