NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Ratsep v Bathurst Regional Council [2007] NSWLEC 115 This decision has been amended. Please see the end of the judgment for a list of the amendments.
APPLICANT Margus Alexander Ratsep PARTIES : RESPONDENT Bathurst Regional Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 11085 of 2006
CORAM: Hussey C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Rural subdivision, minimum 100 ha area requirement, compliance with zone objective for viability, precedence
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act Bathurst Regional (Interim) Local Environment Plan 2005
Stockland Development Pty Ltd v Manly Council [2004] NSWLEC 472; CASES CITED: Emmott v Ku-ring-gai Municipal Council [1954] LGRA 177; Goldin & Anor v Minister for Transport Administering the Ports Corporation and Waterways Management Act 1995 [2002] NSWLEC 75
DATES OF HEARING: 27-28 February 2007
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 9 March 2007
APPLICANT Ms M Carpenter, barrister SOLICITORS McPhee Kelshaw LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr I Woodward, solicitor SOLICITORS Storey & Gough
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey C
Date : 9 March 2007
11085 of 2006 Margus Alexander Ratsep v Bathurst Regional Council
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate