NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Arncliffe Development Pty Ltd v Rockdale City Council [2003] NSWLEC 297 APPLICANT Arncliffe Development Pty Ltd PARTIES : RESPONDENT Rockdale City Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10286 of 2003 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Question of Law :- application to modify condition of development consent in relation to s 94 contributions - whether appeal competent because all monies paid under condition - whether Applicant "dissatisfied" under s 96(6) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 - whether s 94(12) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 provides a separate appeal right Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s 94, s 96, s 97 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s 19(h) Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 17 r 1 Bryson Industries Ltd v Sydney City Council (1963) 8 LGRA 395; Minaway v Rockdale City Council (Pearlman J, NSWLEC, 26 April 1996, unreported); CASES CITED: Progress and Securities Pty Ltd v North Sydney Municipal Council (1988) 66 LGRA 237; Security Storage Pty Ltd v Leichhardt Municipal Council (1996) 93 LGERA 176; Toadalla Co Pty Ltd v Dumaresq Shire Council (1992) 78 LGERA 261; Waters v Hurstville City Council (1991) 77 LGRA 11 DATES OF HEARING: 25/09/2003 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/26/2003
APPLICANT Mr B Walker SC with Mr R Beasley (barrister) SOLICITORS Minter Ellison LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms J Jagot (barrister) SOLICITORS Abbott Tout
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate