NSW Caselaw
> Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Tom Engel and Ann H Kocek v Blue Mountains City Council [2003] NSWLEC 402 APPLICANT Tom Engel and Ann H Kocek PARTIES : RESPONDENT Blue Mountains City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10590 of 2003 CORAM: Hoffman C Development Application :- Refusal of s96 application to amend consent No. X/955/2000 for a twin geodesic domed house exceedance of height limit KEY ISSUES: visual impact privacy.
Blue Mountains Local Environmental Plan 1991 LEGISLATION CITED: State Environmental Planning Policy No. 1 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 12/12/03 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 12/12/2003
APPLICANT Ms M-L Taylor, solicitor of Taylor Kelso
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr A Seton, solicitor of Marsdens
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
10590 of 2003
Hoffman C
12 December 2003
Tom Engel and Ann H Kocek Applicant v
Blue Mountains City Council Respondent
Judgment
1. This was a class 1 appeal, No. 10590 of 2003 between T Englel, A Kocek and Blue Mountains City Council in regards to the refusal of the s 96 application to amend consent No. X/955/2000 for a twin geodesic domed house at Lot 29 DP1007065 being No. 37 Kingfisher Crescent, Bullaburra.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate