NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Grover Pty Ltd v Canterbury City Council [2005] NSWLEC 213
APPLICANT Grover Pty Ltd
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Canterbury City Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10616 of 2004
CORAM: Murrell C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Demolition of an existing house and erection of two attached dwellings
LEGISLATION CITED: Canterbury Local Environmental Plan
DATES OF HEARING: 23/08/2004, 16/09/2004 and 17/03/2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 03/17/2005
APPLICANT No appearance
RESPONDENT LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: Mr A Seton, solicitor SOLICITORS Marsdens Law Group
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Murrell C
17 March 2005
10616 of 2004 Grover Pty Ltd v Canterbury City Council
JUDGMENT
1 For the record this is an extempore judgment. This matter has come before me this morning as a part heard matter. This matter first came before me in August 2004. The Court heard evidence, conducted a site inspection and the Court then received advice from the respondent that the draft Local Environmental Plan had been forwarded to the Minister for making, the Minister had declined to make such a plan and as such the Court considered it appropriate in the circumstances of the case at the time on 16 September 2004 to re-open the case to allow the applicant the opportunity of submitting an amended plan.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate