NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Rupert v Manly Council [2004] NSWLEC 276 APPLICANT Laura Rupert PARTIES : RESPONDENT Manly Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 11059 of 2003 CORAM: Nott C KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Childcare centre above existing dwelling - proposed increase in number of children sought from 15 to 25 - no drive-through - traffic and parking - car turntable to be provided on site - noise - privacy LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 97 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 27 January 2004; 24 February 2004 (telephone conference, and final orders) EX TEMPORE 01/27/2004 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT Mr G McKee, solicitor SOLICITORS McKees LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms K Gerathy, solicitor SOLICITORS Abbot Tout
JUDGMENT: IN THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES 11059 of 2003
Nott C
27 January 2004
Laura Rupert Applicant v Manly Council Respondent
Reasons for Judgment
1 . This is an appeal against the council's refusal of a development application to increase the number of children of a childcare centre at 25 Fromelles Avenue, Seaforth, from 15 children to 23 children and to carry out alterations and additions principally to the upstairs section of the building where there is a dwelling.
2 . The application was considered by the council and refused. At the hearing, I heard expert traffic engineering evidence from Mr J Hewitt for the applicant and Mr K Ketheesuran for the council. I also heard expert town-planning evidence and as well took into account the written evidence of Ms A Moore and Mr Armstrong. In addition, I have taken into account the evidence of adjoining or nearby neighbours who attended in person, and I have considered the written documentation presented by both parties.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate