NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Falcomata v Ku-ring-gai Council (No 3) [2005] NSWLEC 541
APPLICANT R Falcomata
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10190 of 2005
CORAM: Moore C
Costs - Development Application :- Pre-existing subdivision s 94 contribution for further subdivision KEY ISSUES: .
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 s94(b)(3) LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Act 1979 s69(8)
Rose Consulting Group v Baulkham Hills Shire Council [2003] 58 NSWLR 159; 129 LGERA 165; CASES CITED: .
DATES OF HEARING: 8 September 2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 09/08/2005
APPLICANT Mr S. Kondilios, solicitor Maddocks Lawyers
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr P. Marincowitz, solicitor Phillips Fox
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Moore C
8 September 2005
05/10190 R Falcomata v Ku-ring-gai Council
JUDGMENT
This decision was given as an extemporaneous decision. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
Contribution pursuant to s 94 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
1 The matter which I am required to determine this morning is the outstanding question of the appropriateness of the contribution proposed by Ku-ring-gai Council (the council) pursuant to s 94 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 (the Act) with respect to Lot 2.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate