NSW Caselaw
Reported Decision : 123 LGERA 24
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Ervin Mahrer and Partners v Strathfield Council [2002] NSWLEC 97 APPLICANT: Ervin Mahrer and Partners PARTIES : RESPONDENT: Strathfield Council FILE NUMBER(S) : 10088 of 2000 CORAM: Bignold J KEY ISSUES: Practice and Procedure :- Application for costs made after perfecting of final orders made in class 1 proceedings-power of court to entertain claim-application of slip rule-Court's practice of not awarding costs in planning appeals Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 69 LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1996 Pt 16, r 16 Supreme Court Rules, Pt 52A, r 48 Bailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529; Birrigan Gargle Local Aboriginal Land Council v Minister Administering the Crown Lands Act (1993) 80 LGERA 389; British Natural Premium Provident Association v Bywater (1897) 2 Ch 531; DJL v Central Authority (2000) 201 CLR 226; CASES CITED: Fritz v Hobson (1880) 14 ChD 542; L Shaddock and Associates Pty Ltd v Parramatta City Council No 2 (1982) 151 CLR 590; Oshlack v Richmond River Council (1998) 193 CLR 72; Re Hodgkinson; Hodgkinson v Hodgkinson (1895) 2 Ch 190; Starray v Sydney City Council (2001) 112 LGERA 438; Wollong Pty Ltd v Shoalhaven City Council (No 2) (2002) NSWLEC 80 DATES OF HEARING: 29 May 2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/24/2002
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate