NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Hornsby Shire Council v Olga Wallis (No. 2) [2004] NSWLEC 440 APPLICANT Hornsby Shire Council PARTIES : RESPONDENT Olga Wallis
FILE NUMBER(S) : 40821 of 2002 CORAM: Pain J KEY ISSUES: Contempt :- Failure to comply with Court orders - failure to purge contempt LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, s 121ZJ(11) Land and Environment Court Act 1979, s 69 CASES CITED: DATES OF HEARING: 21/07/2004 EX TEMPORE 07/21/2004 JUDGMENT DATE :
APPLICANT T G Howard (barrister) SOLICITOR Mr I Woodward LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Ms L L Tucker (barrister) Mr Y Wallis (as agent)
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
PAIN J
21 JULY 2004
40821 OF 2002 HORNSBY SHIRE COUNCIL v
OLGA WALLIS
EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT ON CONTEMPT (NO 2) 1 HER HONOUR: These are contempt of court proceedings taken by the Council against Mrs Wallis. On 2 March 2004 I found Mrs Wallis guilty of contempt of court in that she failed to comply with numerous orders made by this Court on 3 July 2003 in relation to the construction of a retaining wall. On that occasion I allowed her ten weeks to do the necessary work so that the contempt could be purged before I determined what sentence was appropriate.
2 The Council brought the matter back before me on 27 April 2004, some eight weeks later, because no work had been commenced by Mrs Wallis at that stage. I allowed Mrs Wallis another ten weeks for the work to be done before the postponed sentencing hearing on 2 July 2004. Throughout this matter Mrs Wallis has been represented, with her consent, by her husband Mr Wallis and I note that he, on his wife's behalf, has an important decision-making role in relation to the matters before me.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate