NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Marrickville Council v Admark Investments Pty Limited and Another (No 2) [2002] NSWLEC 82 APPLICANT Marrickville Council
PARTIES : FIRST RESPONDENT Admark Investments Pty Limited
SECOND RESPONDENT Portuguese Marble & Granite Pty Limited t/a Euro Abrasives FILE NUMBER(S) : 40193 of 2000 CORAM: Talbot J KEY ISSUES: Costs :- claim by one respondent for an indemnity by the other respondent LEGISLATION CITED: Land and Environment Court Rules 1979 CASES CITED: Marrickville Council v Admark Investments Pty Ltd and Another (2000) 116 LGERA 312 DATES OF HEARING: 06/05/2002 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 05/24/2002
APPLICANT N/A SOLICITORS N/A
FIRST RESPONDENT Mr P C Tomasetti (Barrister) LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: SOLICITORS J S Pinto & Co
SECOND RESPONDENT Ms S A Duggan (Barrister) SOLICITORS Gordon Robilliard Plowman Merton
JUDGMENT:
IN THE LAND AND Matter No. 40193 of 2000 ENVIRONMENT COURT Coram: Talbot J OF NEW SOUTH WALES Decision Date: 24 May 2002
Marrickville Council Applicant v Admark Investments Pty Limited First Respondent Portuguese Marble & Granite Pty Limited t/a Euro Abrasives Second Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1. In a reserved judgment published on 4 October 2001, following discontinuance of the proceedings after the subject property had been vacated, thereby removing the necessity for the making of any orders against either respondent, each of the respondents was ordered to pay one half of the applicant's costs.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate