NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Cox v Ku-ring-gai C [2005] NSWLEC 536
APPLICANT Alister and Judy Cox
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10603 of 2005
CORAM: Hussey C
Development Application :- Construction of a dual occupancy and the removal of several trees KEY ISSUES:
Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 Ku-ring-gai Planning Scheme Ordinance State Environmental Planning Policy No. 53 LEGISLATION CITED: Development Control Plan 47 - Water Management Development Control Plan 40 - Construction and Demolition Waste Management Ku-ring-gai Dual Occupancy Development Control Code. Development Control Plan 31 (DCP 31). - Access
DATES OF HEARING: 01/09/2005
DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/29/2005
APPLICANT Mr J. Hones, solicitor of Hones Lawyers
LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES:
RESPONDENT Mr S. Patterson, solicitor of Wilshire Webb
JUDGMENT: THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Hussey
29 September 2005
10603 of 2005 Alister and Judy Cox v Ku-ring-gai Council
JUDGMENT
Background. 1 This appeal relates to council's refusal of a development application for the construction of a detached dual occupancy dwelling at 27 Ayres Road, St. Ives, which necessitates the removal of several mature trees and vegetation on the site.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate