NSW Caselaw
Land and Environment Court of New South Wales
CITATION : Patterson and Leppinus v Ku-ring-gai Council [2005] NSWLEC 668
APPLICANT David and Renate Patterson and Lynne Leppinus
PARTIES : RESPONDENT Ku-ring-gai Council
FILE NUMBER(S) : 10258 of 2005
CORAM: Bly C
KEY ISSUES: Development Application :- Draft conservation area - heritage significance - streetscape - site landscaping - landscaping bond - residential amenity - accessibility.
LEGISLATION CITED: Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
Falcomata v Ku-ring-gai Council (No. 2) [2005] NSWLEC 459 ; CASES CITED: Allen & Hawkes v Ku-ring-gai Council [2005] NSWLEC 227; Newbury District Council v Secretary of State for the Environment [1981] AC 578
DATES OF HEARING: 26/10/2005 EX TEMPORE JUDGMENT DATE : 10/26/2005
APPLICANT Mr S Kondilios, solicitor SOLICITORS Maddocks LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES: RESPONDENT Mr P Marincowitz, solicitor SOLICITORS Phillips Fox
JUDGMENT: - 5 - THE LAND AND ENVIRONMENT COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES
Bly C
26 October 2005
10258 of 2005 David & Renate Patterson and Lynne Leppinus v Ku-ring-gai Council
JUDGMENT This decision was given extemporaneously on site. It has been revised and edited prior to publication.
We try to embed the page this law was scraped from. If the site blocks framing, you still get the link and a local excerpt.
Last checked with source on —
Checking whether the official page can be embedded…
Plain-English simplify of this law: a short summary, key points, and both sides of the argument. Generated on first view via Replicate, then cached. Vote on what helps your study.
No study brief is cached for this law yet. Sign up to generate a plain-English brief.
Sign up to generate